Skip to main content
ISO/IEC 42001:2023ISO 42001 Consulting & Implementation

ISO 42001 implementation in Australia

ISO 42001 consulting and hands-on implementation delivered by Aegentra under a written scope and named accountability. We inventory the AI you develop, provide or use, run separate risk and impact assessments, build the AIMS, implement the agreed controls and organise evidence for an independent certification body.Teams in Melbourne and Sydney. Delivered across all Australian states and territories, remotely or onsite by arrangement. New Zealand and Asia Pacific by arrangement.Planning an AI-management project in New Zealand? See our ISO 42001 support for New Zealand organisations for local delivery information and guidance.

Standard
ISO/IEC 42001:2023
Annex A
38 controls
Scope
AI you build and use
Output
Working AIMS

/ Delivery team

Who will deliver your ISO 42001 implementation?

The AIMS scope identifies the accountable implementation lead and any specialist contribution needed for the AI systems, risks and governance processes inside scope.

ResponsibilityAccountable delivery
Assigned roleISO 42001 implementation lead
How it is confirmedThe named lead, work packages, responsibilities and exclusions are recorded in the written scope.
ResponsibilitySpecialist contribution
Assigned roleAssigned where the AI estate or agreed controls require it
How it is confirmedThe function and responsibility are disclosed before that specialist work begins.
ResponsibilityAssurance boundary
Assigned roleSeparately scoped internal auditor and certification body
How it is confirmedA different competent Aegentra consultant may perform the separately scoped internal audit after documented competence, prior-involvement, conflict and impartiality checks. The auditor must not audit their own work; a separate provider is required if objectivity and impartiality cannot be protected. An independent accredited certification body decides certification.

Qualified delivery matched to your scope

Our team combines implementation, audit, security-governance and technical expertise. Across their professional careers, team members have delivered 2,000+ hours of ISO, ISM and GRC audit work across 70+ organisations.

Team qualifications and credentials

Qualifications, professional credentials and formal training held across Aegentra’s delivery team.

Management systems and audit

  • ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Implementer
  • ISO/IEC 27701 Lead Implementer
  • PECB ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor
  • ISO/IEC 42001 Lead Auditor
  • CISA — Certified Information Systems Auditor
  • ISM Auditor

Cybersecurity and cloud

  • CISSP — Certified Information Systems Security Professional
  • CISM — Certified Information Security Manager
  • Certificate of Cloud Security Knowledge (CCSK)
  • OSCP+ — OffSec Certified Professional Plus

Service delivery and specialist training

  • ITIL Expert
  • PRINCE2
  • Mastering Generative AI for Cybersecurity Certificate
  • Essential Eight Assessment Course certificate — TAFEcyber

Further training and audit qualifications across the team include ISO/IEC 42001 Lead Implementer training, ASD ISM General and Technical audit codes, ISO/IEC 27017 and ISO/IEC 27018 audit codes, and ISO 9001 and ISO 19011 audit qualifications.

Credentials are held across the delivery team and matched to assigned roles. The proposal identifies the consultants, responsibilities and relevant qualification evidence before work begins.

The people assigned to your engagement—and the experience and qualification evidence relevant to their roles—are confirmed in your proposal before work begins.

Not every AIMS requires the same delivery roles. The assignment follows the agreed AI inventory, risk profile and implementation boundary.

How we price

One fixed fee. Agreed after we understand the AI estate.

Discovery confirms the systems, roles, suppliers and existing governance in scope. You then receive a fixed implementation price with written assumptions, client responsibilities and independent certification-body fees clearly separated.

Fixed scopeFixed priceWritten assumptionsCertification fees separated

The AIMS evidence trail

Start with the AI system. Not a policy template.

Every decision must remain traceable from the system and its context to the evidence that proves the selected control operates.

Colleagues talking through a project in an open-plan office.
Illustrative workshop — connecting systems, responsibilities and evidence.
  • Inventory

    Know every AI system, owner, purpose, supplier and boundary.

  • Risk

    Assess what can affect organisational objectives.

  • Impact

    Assess effects on individuals, groups and society.

  • Controls

    Select the applicable Annex A controls and justify exclusions.

  • Evidence

    Retain proof that oversight, monitoring and review operate.

For organisations using Microsoft 365 Copilot, a Microsoft 365 permissions and data-protection review can support the technical work alongside the wider AIMS.

Looking to develop your own implementation skills? Explore the PECB ISO 42001 Lead Implementer course and exam. Training is purchased separately from a consulting engagement; an individual credential does not certify your organisation.

If the AI system you govern is also an agent you sell to customers, see AIUC-1 readiness for AI agent vendors, the agent-level certification enterprise buyers now ask for alongside ISO 42001.

The implementation sequence

Every AI decision.
Connected to evidence.

The timing is confirmed after discovery because every AI estate is different. The sequence is fixed: understand the systems, assess their risks and impacts, operate the controls, then prove they work.

Stage 1

Inventory and scope

AI system register + AIMS scope

We identify the AI you develop, provide and use, then assign owners, boundaries, suppliers and interested parties.

Stage 2

Risk and impact

Risk register + impact assessments

Organisation risk and outward impacts on people, groups and society are assessed separately and connected to treatment decisions.

Stage 3

AIMS design

Policies + Statement of Applicability

Clauses 4 to 10 and the 38 Annex A controls are mapped to accountable owners, procedures and evidence requirements.

Stage 4

Controls in operation

Operating controls + retained evidence

Human oversight, data governance, supplier controls, monitoring and incident processes are put into operation where the AI runs.

Stage 5

Assurance

Audit findings + management review

An impartial internal audit samples the AIMS, corrective actions are closed and leadership reviews performance before certification.

Stage 6

Auditor handover

Stage 1 and Stage 2 evidence pack

The selected certification body receives an organised evidence set, while your team keeps ownership of the live AIMS.

Outcomes

What your AI management system includes.

Marketing copy makes promises. We list outcomes you can verify.

  • A complete AI system inventory with owners, purposes, suppliers and life-cycle status.
  • AI risk and impact assessments that remain distinct, linked and reviewable.
  • A justified Statement of Applicability covering the 38 Annex A controls.
  • Operating evidence for human oversight, data governance, monitoring and third-party AI.
  • An AIMS evidence pack ready for an independent Stage 1 and Stage 2 certification audit.

Internal audit

AIMS already built? We audit it.

We audit an operating AIMS against agreed criteria, including Clauses 4 to 10 and applicable Annex A controls. If Aegentra implemented the AIMS, a different competent consultant may perform the separately scoped audit after documented competence, prior-involvement, conflict and impartiality checks. The auditor must not audit their own work. If objectivity and impartiality cannot be protected, a separate provider is required.

Fixed feeEvidence samplingIndependent by design

Client case study

What an AIMS implementation actually looks like.

A board-approved AI policy, a certified model provider and a documented human-in-the-loop control — and all three worth very little on inspection. The ISO 42001 implementation case study sets out eight AI governance mistakes we see repeatedly, the order the work was done in, and why the inventory comes before the policy. It describes a real client engagement. The client is unnamed to protect confidentiality; these results are specific to the engagement, not a guarantee for another organisation.

Audited engagement records, where the figures are the audited totals from the engagement, are published in the Aegentra case studies.

Watch

ISO/IEC 42001:2023

What an AI management system governs.

This short introduction explains the management-system structure behind responsible AI governance. Aegentra's service turns that structure into owners, controls and operating evidence.

FAQ

Things buyers ask first.

Yes. The relevant question is what your organisation does with AI, not only whether it builds a model. Using an external model can still involve decisions about intended use, affected people, data, human oversight, supplier dependencies and incident handling. Define your role and the AI activities in scope. A supplier’s assurance can inform that assessment, but it does not certify your organisation’s use of the service.

They answer related but different questions. A risk assessment supports decisions about uncertainty, objectives and treatment; an impact assessment examines potential consequences of an AI system’s use for affected people or groups and society. Connect both to the intended use, evidence, accountable decisions and review triggers. Completing a form for one purpose does not automatically cover the other, and neither is a blanket determination of legal compliance.

Consider the actions it can perform, the data it can reach, who authorised those permissions and how an action can be stopped or reversed. Record testing, human approval points, monitoring and escalation against the intended use. A read-only demonstration is not evidence that production write access is safe. The implementation scope can address those governance decisions; specialist technical testing and production changes must be expressly agreed.

ISO/IEC 42001 is a voluntary management-system standard. A customer contract or tender may require certification or particular governance evidence, so check the applicable terms. Certification does not by itself establish legal compliance or satisfy every procurement requirement.

No. Neither standard is a prerequisite for the other. Their compatible management-system structures mean an operating ISMS may provide reusable processes for document control, competence, internal audit, management review and corrective action. The actual reuse depends on scope and maturity and is assessed during discovery.

The plan depends on the number and complexity of AI systems, existing governance, evidence maturity and access to accountable owners. Aegentra confirms a staged timeline after discovery and separates implementation milestones from the independent certification body’s Stage 1 and Stage 2 dates.

Aegentra provides a fixed scope and written price after discovery. The quote identifies assumptions, client responsibilities and exclusions. Certification-body audit fees are separate and must be obtained from the selected body because they vary with scope, locations and audit time.

A course develops a person’s knowledge and leads to the applicable PECB examination and credential pathway. This service builds an organisation’s AI management system. Aegentra implements and prepares the AIMS; only an independent accredited certification body can certify the organisation. Training runs separately through Aegentra Academy.

No. An AIMS can organise governance evidence, but ISO 42001 certification does not establish EU AI Act compliance. The European Commission distinguishes ISO 42001 from the quality-management requirements under the Act. Assess applicable obligations and any relevant harmonised standards separately with appropriately qualified advice.

You define the scope. It typically covers the AI use cases inside your product, the data pipelines feeding them, the model life cycle from development to retirement, the human-oversight controls, and the third-party AI you embed. In a Microsoft-based environment that usually means Microsoft 365 Copilot, Azure OpenAI, embedded model APIs, and any classifiers, recommendation engines, or generative features in your own product.

Our fastest path is for Microsoft 365 and Azure tenants, where most Australian SMB AI use already runs and where the Aeges risk engine collects evidence automatically. Other environments can be scoped during the Week 0 discovery — the AIMS framework is platform-agnostic; the speed advantage comes from building the controls where your AI actually lives.

An independent accredited certification body issues the certificate. Aegentra implements and prepares the AIMS but does not make the certification decision. Attendance during Stage 1 and Stage 2 is agreed with the client and remains subject to the certification body's rules.

Let's talk.

Schedule a high-level technical consultation with a senior engineer. We evaluate your current posture and define a precise, actionable roadmap.

Fixed scope · assumptions and fees agreed before delivery

Book discovery call