Impartiality
The person who designed or operates a process should not audit their own work.
ISO 9001 internal audit · Australia
An ISO 19011-aligned audit of your quality management system, evidenced from operational records—not a checklist somebody ticked.
Melbourne-based and delivered across Australia. We test exportable quality records at population level where practical and trace process controls end to end.
Delivered across Australia — all states and territories — with remote delivery and onsite attendance by arrangement. New Zealand and wider Asia Pacific engagements may be available by arrangement.

/ 2026 transition
ISO/TC 176 has scheduled the sixth edition for 16 September 2026. Formal transition arrangements will be confirmed through the accreditation and certification system; projected deadlines remain provisional.
The revision is expected to retain the familiar management-system architecture. For a functioning QMS, transition should be managed as an evidence-led update rather than an overnight rebuild.
Before publication, we separate confirmed requirements from draft-stage expectations. After publication, the transition review can test the final changed requirements directly.
/ Why it matters
Weak audit programmes tend to expose the same faults: unclear criteria, checklist-only fieldwork, poor evidence references, self-review threats and corrective actions never tested for effectiveness.
The person who designed or operates a process should not audit their own work.
Follow real work and records end to end instead of accepting verbal assurance.
Give findings owners, dates, cause evaluation and effectiveness checks.
/ Evidence-led testing
Where quality records are exportable, we can test the population rather than a handful of selected files: overdue nonconformities, recurring suppliers, lapsed evaluations, calibration dates, complaints and objectives.
Leadership, awareness, knowledge and risk-based thinking remain evidence-and-interview tests. A finding must rest on evidence that existed independently of the audit.

/ Audit coverage
We test whether context, interested parties, scope and process interactions reflect the organisation operating today—including the climate-change consideration introduced by Amendment 1:2024.
We test leadership commitment, customer focus, the quality policy, resourcing and whether named people understand their responsibilities and authorities.
We test whether risks, opportunities, measurable quality objectives and organisational changes are planned, owned and evaluated for effectiveness.
We test resources, infrastructure, calibration, knowledge, competence, awareness, communication and document control against operating evidence.
We trace work end to end through requirements, design where applicable, suppliers, production or service delivery, release, changes and nonconforming outputs.
We test monitoring, customer satisfaction, analysis, the internal-audit programme itself and every required management-review input and output.
We test correction, cause evaluation, corrective action, effectiveness review and continual improvement as an operating process—not merely a register.
Our team combines implementation, audit, security-governance and technical expertise. Across their professional careers, team members have delivered 2,000+ hours of ISO, ISM and GRC audit work across 70+ organisations.
Qualifications, professional credentials and formal training held across Aegentra’s delivery team.
Further training and audit qualifications across the team include ISO/IEC 42001 Lead Implementer training, ASD ISM General and Technical audit codes, ISO/IEC 27017 and ISO/IEC 27018 audit codes, and ISO 9001 and ISO 19011 audit qualifications.
NV1 security clearance is held within the team. It is a personnel clearance, not a company accreditation or government endorsement. Any clearance requirement and the assigned consultant’s current status are confirmed for the engagement.
Credentials are held across the team and matched to assigned roles. Your proposal identifies the consultants, their responsibilities and the relevant qualification evidence before work begins.
/ Method
The work moves from an agreed scope to evidence, interviews and findings, then closes with action owners and verification.
We agree sites, processes, clauses, objectives, exclusions, schedule, people and records in writing before fieldwork.
We request read-only exports from ERP, project, CRM, complaints, nonconformance, calibration and supplier systems.
We follow work from enquiry through delivery and compare the documented process with the process people actually operate.
Every finding is classified, cited to a clause and tied to objective evidence before the report is issued.
You receive the report, findings register and clause 10.2 corrective-action structure, with optional follow-up verification.
Scope evidence testing findings follow-up
/ Competence boundary
We are strongest in professional and technical services, software, technology, wholesale, distribution, workforce services, education, healthcare administration and integrated ISO 9001–ISO 27001 systems.
Clause 8 is where sector knowledge matters. Heavy manufacturing, food processing, aerospace, automotive and technically complex production require competence in the process—not only the clause.
Where specialist competence is required, we scope a sector-qualified lead auditor rather than overstate capability.
/ Independence
Clause 9.2.2 requires objectivity and impartiality. Where Aegentra implemented or materially designed a QMS, we do not present the same work as an independent internal audit. We scope an independent auditor or tell you plainly to take the audit elsewhere.
Implementation, internal audit and accredited certification remain distinct responsibilities.
/ Outputs
/ Commercials
Engagements are fixed-fee and quoted after a short scoping call. Effort depends on sites, process complexity, applicable design requirements, record accessibility and audit-programme maturity.
/ Comparison
| Option | What you get | Where it falls short |
|---|---|---|
| Your quality manager | Deep QMS familiarity and no external fee | Objectivity can fail where they built or operate the process. |
| Your implementation consultant | Convenient and already familiar | Creates a self-review threat when they audit their own work. |
| Checklist and available staff member | A low-cost audit record | A ticked template does not demonstrate process auditing or competence. |
| Large firm | Recognised name and enterprise capacity | May be priced and staffed for a larger engagement than your scope needs. |
| Aegentra | Independent evidence-led testing, fixed scope and transition review | We do not audit a QMS we built; specialist operations may need a sector-qualified auditor. |
/ Practitioner evidence
Delivery is principal-led and informed by governance and audit work across Australian government and regulated environments. Aegentra is a PECB Authorised Training Partner; audit work remains separately scoped.
/ Questions answered
Yes. Clause 9.2 requires internal audits at planned intervals to determine whether the QMS conforms to the organisation’s requirements and ISO 9001, and whether it is effectively implemented and maintained.
ISO/TC 176 has scheduled the sixth edition for publication on 16 September 2026. A transition period will apply, but the formal arrangements and deadline must be confirmed by the relevant accreditation and certification bodies.
The revision retains the familiar management-system structure while updating emphasis and guidance. Final transition planning should be based on the published edition and confirmed certification-body arrangements.
No. Use the planning window to identify changes, test them through the internal-audit programme and build evidence before the formal transition audit.
Yes. ISO 9001:2015/Amd 1:2024 is published. Organisations must determine whether climate change is relevant under clause 4.1; clause 4.2 notes that interested parties can have climate-related requirements.
Yes, provided auditors are selected to preserve objectivity and impartiality and do not audit their own work.
At planned intervals. Frequency should reflect process importance, organisational changes and previous audit results.
An internal audit is performed by or for the organisation. A certification audit is performed by an accredited certification body, and only that body can issue the certificate. Aegentra does not issue certification.
Yes, where independence and scope permit. Shared governance processes can be tested together while discipline-specific requirements remain separate.
Read-only exports and documented information relevant to scope—commonly job records, complaints, nonconformities, calibration, suppliers, competence, management review and previous audits.
The timeline is confirmed after scoping and depends on sites, processes, applicable design requirements, record quality and process-owner availability.
It depends on the process. Technically complex or sector-specific production may require a suitably qualified sector auditor.
Yes. Aegentra delivers remotely across Australia, with onsite attendance by arrangement. New Zealand engagements may be available by arrangement.
/ Scope the audit
A twenty-minute call is enough to establish scope, evidence needs and whether a single audit or multi-year programme fits. You receive a fixed fee in writing—or an honest recommendation to use a different specialist.